Kerala Shipwreck and Oil Spill: Understanding the Environmental and Human Impacts

The recent sinking of the Liberian-flagged cargo vessel MSC ELSA 3 off the Kerala coast has triggered widespread concerns about a potential environmental disaster. The ship, carrying over 600 containers including hazardous chemicals, diesel, and furnace oil, capsized near Alappuzha, raising the threat of oil spills and plastic pellet pollution along India’s ecologically sensitive coastline. While rescue efforts saved all crew members, the incident has spotlighted the urgent need for robust marine disaster management systems. With authorities scrambling to contain pollutants and assess damage, this episode serves as a critical reminder of the fragile balance between maritime trade and marine sustainability.

What exactly happened with the cargo ship?

On May 25, 2025, a cargo ship named MSC ELSA 3, flagged under Liberia, sank off the coast of Kerala, around 25–38 nautical miles southwest of Alappuzha and Kochi. The vessel, which was en route from Vizhinjam to Kochi, developed a 26-degree tilt and ultimately capsized. The ship was 28 years old and carried 640 containers, including 13 marked as hazardous, 12 carrying calcium carbide, and significant volumes of furnace oil (367 metric tonnes) and diesel (84.44 metric tonnes).

Thankfully, all 24 crew members were rescued after a coordinated operation involving the Indian Coast Guard (ICG) and INS Sujata. However, the greater concern that followed was the environmental threat, especially from possible oil spills and hazardous chemicals. Several containers started drifting ashore, and plastic pellets (nurdles) began appearing along beaches in Thiruvananthapuram, Kollam, and Alappuzha, raising fears among local fishing communities and marine ecologists.

The Indian authorities quickly classified the situation as a state-specific disaster, launching a pollution response operation and mobilizing several monitoring agencies like CMFRI, INCOIS, and NIO for emergency tracking and assessment of contamination in sea water and shorelines.

Why is an oil spill dangerous to the ecosystem?

An oil spill is one of the most severe forms of marine pollution, causing multi-layered damage to both the environment and local livelihoods. Even though officials initially claimed no major oil leakage, patches of oil slick were spotted along the coast, and agencies continue to monitor potential worsening of the situation.

Here’s how an oil spill creates devastation:

• Kills marine organisms by coating them with oil, which blocks oxygen and damages reproductive organs.
• Destroys coral reefs and mangroves, which are critical to coastal biodiversity.
• Affects fish breeding grounds, especially during the monsoon season when breeding activity peaks.
• Contaminates seafood, leading to long-term health issues for humans due to bioaccumulation and biomagnification of toxic substances.
• Impacts small-scale and artisanal fishermen, whose incomes depend on near-shore fishing activities.
• Forms tarballs, sticky black blobs that can settle on the seabed and remain for years, reducing the oxygen level in bottom ecosystems.
• Suspends heavy hydrocarbons in water, which persist in the environment and are difficult to remove.
• Spreads rapidly on the surface due to oil’s lighter-than-water property, forming a slick that is carried by currents and wind.

In Kerala’s case, experts have emphasized that even if an immediate large-scale spill was avoided, the long-term threats remain, especially from furnace oil, which is heavier and more persistent. These oil forms degrade slowly and settle into marine food webs. The Arabian Sea, although warm and active in microbial degradation, cannot entirely prevent deep-seated ecological damage without intervention.

Where are the most affected coastal zones located?

The coastal districts of Kerala, particularly Alappuzha, Thiruvananthapuram, and Kollam, are currently on high alert. These regions are facing the immediate brunt of both floating containers and pollutants such as oil patches and nurdles (tiny plastic pellets used in plastic manufacturing). Simulations conducted by the Indian National Centre for Ocean Information Services (INCOIS) indicate that the oil and plastic drift could impact up to 84 nautical miles of coastline, especially around Kovalam and Kochuveli.

Key impact areas include:

• Thumba and Kochuveli beaches in Thiruvananthapuram, where large quantities of nurdles have already washed up.
• Cheriazheekal, Neendakara, and Chavara in Kollam, where containers have burst open, spilling contents.
• Alappuzha and Arattupuzha, where diesel and furnace oil presence is suspected and cleanup operations are ongoing.

To manage the drift and prevent shore contamination, the Indian Coast Guard has deployed aerial surveillance and multiple pollution response ships. Booms and skimmers are being used to contain and extract surface oil. Yet, rough monsoon tides have made the clean-up extremely challenging.

When did the oil leak and pollutant spread begin?

The vessel began tilting on May 24, 2025, and sank completely by the next morning. The first signs of pollution were reported on May 26, with containers seen drifting and nurdles appearing along Kerala’s beaches. While the government initially denied any major oil spill, INCOIS and CMFRI reported oil slicks and confirmed that bunker oil, a type of heavy marine fuel, was present near the shore.

The spread has continued since then, and cleanup operations have been underway from May 27 onwards. The Kerala State Disaster Management Authority (KSDMA) declared the incident a state-specific disaster and set July 3 as the deadline for completing oil recovery efforts. Despite partial containment, experts believe that leaks could continue for weeks, especially if the vessel’s submerged fuel tanks break open further due to underwater pressure or corrosion.

• Timeline Highlights:
  • May 24: Ship develops tilt and distress signal is sent.
  • May 25: MSC ELSA 3 capsizes.
  • May 26: First containers and plastic pellets wash ashore.
  • May 27 onwards: Cleanup operations intensify.
  • Expected recovery window: Four to eight weeks for surface slicks; six months to years for full seabed healing.

The onset of monsoon has worsened the drift pattern and delayed operations, increasing fears of further leakage and contamination along Kerala’s eco-sensitive coasts.

Who are the key stakeholders and responders involved?

The Kerala shipwreck crisis has drawn in multiple government agencies, scientific institutions, and international stakeholders, all working together to contain the ecological impact and ensure public safety. The key players include:

• Indian Coast Guard (ICG): Leading the pollution response operation under the National Oil Spill Disaster Contingency Plan. They have deployed:
  • Ships like ICGS Saksham, Aryaman, and Vikram.
  • Aircraft such as Dornier surveillance planes for aerial mapping of oil slicks.
  • Oil Spill Dispersants (OSD) to break down surface slicks.
  • Pollution Response Vessel Samudra Prahari, equipped with skimmers, booms, and response tools.
• Kerala State Disaster Management Authority (KSDMA): Declared the incident a state-specific disaster, coordinated coastal alerts, container retrieval, and volunteer deployment.
• Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI): Tasked with collecting water and sediment samples from affected beaches and assessing the presence of oil, hydrocarbons, and microplastics in marine organisms and coastal sediments.
• Indian National Centre for Ocean Information Services (INCOIS): Provided drift simulation maps, predicted the oil movement and nurdle spread along the coast, and continues to issue advisories.
• National Institute of Oceanography (NIO): Collaborating in a 10-day vessel-based survey to measure oil concentrations, alkalinity, and marine toxicity at various ocean depths.
• Mercantile Marine Department (MMD), Kochi: Investigating the cargo manifest and has issued a pollution liability notice to the ship’s owners.
• Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC): The vessel’s owner, responsible for salvage and cleanup operations, has hired T&T Salvage, an international marine emergency firm.
• District Disaster Management Authorities (DDMAs): Mobilised 108 personnel across Thiruvananthapuram, Kollam, and Alappuzha for container retrieval and beach cleanup.
• Fishermen’s Unions and Local Communities: Demand transparency about container contents, regular water quality updates, and compensation for loss of livelihood.

Together, these stakeholders are navigating logistical challenges, poor weather, and ecological complexity to prevent long-term harm and restore safety in the region.

How are oil spills and pollutants cleaned up?

Cleaning up an oil spill in open seas and coastal zones is a technically difficult, expensive, and time-consuming process, especially when the spill involves heavy oils like furnace oil and hazardous chemicals such as calcium carbide.

Key cleanup techniques being used or proposed in Kerala include:

• Oil Booms: Floating barriers placed around the spill to prevent oil from spreading.
• Skimmers: Machines that remove oil from the water surface once it’s contained within booms.
• Dispersants: Chemicals sprayed over slicks from ships or aircraft to break oil into smaller droplets, allowing microbial degradation.
• Oleophilic materials: Sponges and sheets that attract oil but repel water, used in absorbing slicks.
• Manual collection: For shore-based pollution like nurdles, trained volunteers and civil defence teams are collecting plastic pellets and container debris by hand, aided by drone surveys.
• Sediment and biota testing: Long-term monitoring of fish, molluscs, and seabed samples to assess the presence of hydrocarbons and heavy metals.
• Exclusion zones: Fishing bans and public safety alerts are being enforced within a 200-metre radius of container sightings.

Challenges in the cleanup include:

• Rough sea conditions due to the monsoon.
• Difficulty in reaching sunken cargo or ruptured tanks underwater.
• Unpredictable currents and wind altering the drift path of pollutants.
• The complex interaction of oil with sand, plankton, and sediments making removal incomplete.

Experts warn that cleanup may take months to years, and even then, some toxins will linger in the marine environment, requiring continuous monitoring and scientific support.

What is the broader significance of this incident?

The sinking of MSC ELSA 3 is more than an isolated maritime mishap—it’s a wake-up call for India’s preparedness in handling marine environmental disasters. The event has brought national attention to the fragility of the Arabian Sea’s coastal ecosystems, especially during the monsoon season when biodiversity peaks and fish breeding occurs.

Here’s why this incident holds broader importance:

• Threat to marine biodiversity: Kerala’s coastal waters are home to coral reefs, mangroves, fish spawning zones, and benthic ecosystems. An oil spill threatens all of these, especially due to persistent hydrocarbons in furnace oil that remain for years.
• Risk to food security and livelihoods: Kerala’s economy has a large artisanal fishing population. Even a perceived threat to seafood safety can damage market trust, reduce income, and increase migration from affected communities.
• Pollution from plastic nurdles: This is India’s first recorded case of a nurdle spill from a shipwreck. These microplastics are not only difficult to remove but also absorb toxins and enter the food chain when consumed by marine life.
• Public health risks: Pollutants like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and heavy metals found in oil and nurdles can accumulate in seafood, posing long-term carcinogenic and reproductive risks to humans.
• Legal and international implications: Under the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, the shipping company may be liable for environmental restoration costs and compensation. This incident underlines the importance of enforcing international maritime regulations in Indian waters.
• Need for ecological governance: The shipwreck spotlights gaps in state-level marine disaster planning, port authority transparency, and cargo manifest disclosure, all of which are critical for preventing and managing future crises.

This disaster thus becomes a pivotal example of the intersection between shipping, environment, and governance, demanding immediate lessons and systemic corrections.

What are the main limitations and gaps in response?

Despite the swift deployment of Coast Guard ships, aircraft, and cleanup crews, the response to the Kerala shipwreck reveals several serious limitations and bottlenecks:

• Lack of cargo transparency: Authorities, including port officials and customs, failed to disclose the full cargo manifest promptly, creating confusion about the hazardous materials onboard.
• Inadequate pre-planning: There was no immediate containment boom deployed before the leak started. Early containment in the first 48 hours could have significantly reduced environmental exposure.
• Monsoon interference: The timing of the incident during the monsoon has made containment and shoreline access difficult, highlighting the need for season-specific preparedness.
• Insufficient coastal disaster units: Despite Kerala being a maritime state, it lacks dedicated marine disaster response units that can work with fishermen, local bodies, and scientists in a coordinated manner.
• No national nurdle handling policy: Unlike oil, which has defined protocols, plastic pellets are a poorly regulated pollutant in India. There’s no specific nurdle spill response strategy, making cleanup ad-hoc and inefficient.
• Poor community engagement: Fishermen’s unions have complained of delayed communication, mistrust in government statements, and no clear health advisories about seafood consumption.
• Limited real-time data: Although INCOIS and CMFRI are conducting studies, there is no open public dashboard providing daily updates on water quality, fish safety, or contaminant levels.

These gaps show that India still lacks a robust marine environmental emergency architecture—one that integrates technology, local knowledge, legal accountability, and ecological science.

What are the key challenges in managing the disaster?

The MSC ELSA 3 shipwreck has presented a complex mix of logistical, ecological, and administrative challenges, each compounding the impact of the disaster and slowing recovery efforts. The following are the most critical challenges faced by authorities and environmental responders:

• Monsoon-driven access limitations: The arrival of the southwest monsoon has made access to nearshore and deep-sea zones extremely risky, delaying response operations like boom placement, oil skimming, and container retrieval.
• Submerged hazardous containers: Many of the 640 containers, including those with calcium carbide and other undisclosed chemicals, remain unaccounted for underwater, posing potential explosion or leaching hazards. Retrieval from seabeds is technically demanding and requires specialized salvage teams and equipment.
• Uncertain volume of oil leaked: Despite efforts, officials still don’t have a precise estimate of how much diesel and furnace oil has leaked. Without this, it’s difficult to gauge the scope of environmental exposure and design effective remediation.
• Toxicity of furnace oil: The thick, heavy, tar-like consistency of furnace oil makes it extremely difficult to skim or degrade naturally. It also sinks into sediments, where it continues releasing carcinogenic hydrocarbons over time.
• Plastic pellet dispersion: Nurdles, once spilled, behave like microplastic landmines—light, floatable, and long-lasting. They can travel hundreds of kilometres, making containment virtually impossible and cleanup laborious and manpower-intensive.
• Lack of hazardous material detection systems: There is no automated monitoring system for tracking the release of volatile gases from calcium carbide or other toxic materials that may now be slowly reacting underwater.
• Multiple agency coordination: With agencies like the ICG, CMFRI, INCOIS, DG Shipping, and KSDMA involved, the absence of a single nodal command authority has led to data silos, delayed decisions, and unclear messaging to the public.
• Economic disruption: Small-scale fishers, already battling seasonal lean periods, now face fishing bans, market distrust of seafood, and potential contamination of catch, with no immediate relief or insurance coverage mechanisms in place.
• Lack of public awareness and education: Coastal communities remain vulnerable due to lack of awareness on how to safely handle beached containers or detect early signs of chemical exposure, raising risks of accidents or toxic contact.

These multi-dimensional challenges require not just short-term containment but deep structural reforms in marine disaster preparedness, coastal zoning, and industrial shipping regulation.

What is the proposed way forward from experts?

Experts and authorities across marine biology, disaster management, and oceanography have suggested a multi-pronged strategy to not only manage the current crisis but also to prevent similar disasters in the future. The key elements of this strategy include:

• Comprehensive cargo disclosure: Ensure that shipping manifests are digitally available to port, customs, and environmental agencies. This will speed up risk assessment and targeted recovery in case of future accidents.
• State-level marine disaster units: Set up dedicated marine emergency cells in coastal states like Kerala, equipped with trained responders, satellite links, drones, and underwater recovery technology.
• Emergency oil spill infrastructure: Deploy mobile oil booms, skimmers, dispersant sprayers, and oil sensors at major Indian ports so they can be transported immediately to any spill site within 12 hours.
• Long-term ecological monitoring: Follow international protocols for post-spill surveillance—12 to 36 months of continuous sampling of water, seabed, and marine organisms to track toxins like PAHs, heavy metals, and microplastics.
• Nurdle spill regulation: Introduce strict packaging, handling, and tracking guidelines for plastic pellets, and include nurdles under India’s marine pollution regulation framework.
• Legal accountability framework: Enforce penalties under the Merchant Shipping Act and international marine liability conventions, ensuring that shipowners bear the full cost of cleanup and compensation to affected communities.
• Fishermen relief and compensation: Provide interim financial aid, alternative livelihood options, and insurance claims processing for small-scale fishers affected by oil-related fishery bans or health risks.
• Community engagement: Develop public information campaigns, train volunteers for shoreline recovery, and create early alert systems to guide communities during maritime disasters.
• Strengthening international cooperation: India should collaborate with IMO, ITOPF, and regional marine protection organisations to enhance its spill-response capabilities and incorporate best global practices.
• Institutionalizing drills and audits: Conduct regular mock spill drills, port safety audits, and stress tests on shipping lines transporting hazardous materials.

If adopted, these steps can create a more resilient marine safety net, reduce the lag in emergency response, and better protect coastal ecosystems and livelihoods from similar events in the future.

Conclusion: Why this disaster is a turning point

The MSC ELSA 3 shipwreck off Kerala’s coast is not just an environmental incident but a powerful warning about the growing vulnerability of our marine ecosystems, the limitations of disaster response systems, and the risks posed by modern maritime trade. Although the immediate threat of a massive oil slick may have been averted, the lingering presence of furnace oil, diesel, calcium carbide, and nurdles in the sea and on the shore poses a long-term challenge that cannot be overlooked.

Kerala’s rich coastal biodiversity, the livelihood of its artisanal fishing communities, and public health are all intertwined with the health of the sea. The slow degradation of heavy oils, the silent accumulation of microplastics in marine species, and the uncertain status of submerged hazardous cargo underline the need for continuous monitoring and transparent governance. This disaster also highlights how unprepared our systems are to deal with cumulative and complex marine pollution, particularly when it involves multiple pollutants and vulnerable populations.

Moving forward, India must treat this incident as a case study in reform—to invest in marine disaster infrastructure, strengthen port oversight, establish oil spill response frameworks, and empower coastal communities through science, transparency, and compensation mechanisms. Only then can we hope to safeguard our waters and people from similar disasters in the future.

---

Practice Question: What are the ecological and socioeconomic impacts of oil and nurdle spills on coastal communities and biodiversity? (250 words)