Lt-Governor (L-G) Vs Puducherry Government – What is the tussle?

|
The Madras High Court has recently ruled that the Lieutenant Governor (L-G) of Puducherry should not interfere with the day-to-day administration of the Union Territory when an elected government is in place.
The court argued that the continued interference from the L-G would amount to running a “Parallel government”.
Notably, the Supreme Court has also given a similar verdict on Delhi Government Vs Lieutenant Governor (L-G) in July 2018.
Mindmap Learning Programme (MLP)
Absorb information like a sponge!
- Current Affairs (Newsbits, Editorials & In-depths)
- Indian Polity
- Indian Economy
- Art & Culture
- Geography (World & Indian)
- Environment
- Ancient Indian History
- Medieval Indian History
- Modern Indian History
- Post-Independence Indian History
- World History
- International Relations
- Ethics
- Indian Society & Social Justice
- Internal Security
- Disasters & its Management
- Governance
- Science & Technology
- Syllabus-wise learning
- Prelims Sureshots (Repeated Topic Compilations)
What is the issue?
- Kiran Bedi, the incumbent Lieutenant Governor (L-G) of Puducherry, has been in a prolonged dispute, over the extent of powers with Chief Minister Narayanasamy.
- The CM has claimed that the LG has been neglecting the elected government and seeking to run the UT on her own.
What is the High Court verdict?
Parallel govt: The continued interference from the L-G would mean running a “parallel government” when an elected regime is in place.
Aid and advice of Govt: The L-G is bound by the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers headed by the Chief Minister.
Government secretaries:
- Should take instructions from and report to the Council of Ministers headed by the Chief Minister.
- Not empowered to issue orders on their own or upon the instructions of L-G.
Medium of communication:
- The HC has also disregarded the alleged practice of government officials being part of social media L-G was giving instructions to them via these groups for redressal of public grievances.
- The court ordered that the officials should use only the authorised medium of communication for administrative purposes.
Referring the matter to President:
- L-G’s power to refer any matter to President to address differences does not mean “ Every Matter”.
Advice to Centre and L-G:
- The Centre and the L-G should be true to the concept of democratic principles in order to uphold the constitutional scheme on democracy and republicanism.
- This ruling is inspired by the Supreme Court’s earlier appeal to constitutional morality and trust among higher dignitaries.
What was the Supreme Court’s verdict in this regard?
- In June 2018, Supreme Court gave its verdict in relation to the conflict between the elected government of National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi and the Lt.Governor.
- It ruled that the L-G should act with the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers.
- L-G has to refer the matter to the President in case that a decision on that matter has caused a difference with the Ministry.
- Click here to learn more on Delhi Govt Vs L-G issue.
Thus both SC and the HC verdict made it clear that the Lt.Governor has no independent decision-making powers and cannot interfere with the day-to-day administration of the government.