Indus Waters Treaty: All you need to know

Indus waters treaty upsc ias gk
Dark mode:OFF
Reading time: 7 minutes

After the terror attack in Pulwama, the government has decided to stop India’s share of waters in the Indus river system from flowing into Pakistan. This indicates a shift in the policy of the government with regards to the Indus Waters Treaty.

Indus Waters Treaty upsc ias

What is the Indus Waters Treaty 1960?

Indus waters treaty upsc ias gk

  • It is the treaty that provides for sharing of Indus water between India and Pakistan.
  • It provides India full control over the waters of the 3 Eastern rivers – Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej.
  • The waters of the western rivers – Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab should flow to Pakistan without any restrictions.
    • The Treaty also allows India to utilize 20% of the waters of the western rivers.
      • The use of water can be for the purposes of irrigation, navigation and power generation.
      • But India hasn’t fully utilized this provision so far.
    • The treaty also provides for Permanent Indus Water Commission that meets regularly in order to share information and data and resolve disputes. It consists of 1 Indian commissioner and 1 Pakistan commissioner.
    • It has to be noted that, even though Indus originates from Tibet, China has been kept out of the Treaty.

Indus waters treaty upsc ias gk

 

What is the Timeline of the India-Pak disputes regarding Indus waters?

  • 1948: India cuts off supply in most canals that went to Pakistan. However, it restored it later.
  • 1951: Pakistan accused India of cutting off the water supply to several villages in Pakistan.
  • 1954: World Bank came up with a water-sharing formula for both countries.
  • 1960: Indus Waters Treaty Signed.
  • 1970s: India started building hydropower projects in Kashmir = Pakistan raised concern.
  • 1984: Pakistan opposed India building Tulbul barrage on Jhelum = India halted the construction unilaterally.
  • 2007: Pakistan raised concern regarding Kishanganga Hydroelectric Plant.
  • 2008: Lashkar-e-Taiba launched a campaign against India. Its chief Hafiz Saeed accused India of water terrorism.
  • 2010: Pakistan accused India of cutting off water supply frequently.
  • 2016: India reviews working of Indus Water Treaty in the wake of cross-border terrorism (Uri attack).
  • 2019: Pulwama terror attack by Jaish-e-Mohammed = the government has decided to stop India’s share of waters in the Indus river system from flowing into Pakistan.

Why did India decide to review its policy in 2016?

  • Following the devastating floods of 2014, the need for storage infrastructure as a flood-control initiative was increasingly felt.
  • But more importantly, after the terrorist attack on Army camp in Uri in 2016, the policy shift had happened.

What was the policy shift in 2016?

  • India had temporarily suspended regular meetings of the Indus commissioners after the Uri attack.
  • India decided to utilize more waters of the Indus rivers in order to hurt Pakistan’s interests.
  • India also started the revival of many projects that were either suspended or remained on paper for many years.
    • Most of these projects were in J&K, others were in Punjab and Himachal Pradesh.
    • Some of these projects were put on fast-track mode, declared national projects, and money was approved to resume works.
    • Notable projects are:
      • Bursar hydroelectric project on the Marusudar river (the tributary of Chenab) in Kishtwar, J&K. It will be India’s 1st project on the western rivers to have storage infrastructure.
      • Sawalkot project on the Chenab in J&K.
      • Ugh project in J&K.
      • Shahpur-Kandi project in Gurdaspur, Punjab.
    • Totally, more than 30 projects are under different stages of implementation on the Western rivers, having got the final approvals.
  • In addition to these, other initiatives include:
    • Finalization of a revised detailed project report.
    • Granting of prompt environment clearance.
    • Disbursal of attractive rehabilitation package for affected families.

What are the arguments in favour of restricting water flow to Pakistan?

India has not been fully utilizing its entitlements under the treaty neither on the Eastern nor on the Western rivers.

  • It is because on the western rivers particularly, there has been no strong demand for new infrastructure – hydroelectricity, irrigation, etc. Because the demand for irrigation has decreased over the years as several farmers in J&K moved to horticulture from traditional crops.
  • Hence India has been allowing much more water flow to Pakistan than that has been committed under the Treaty.

Due to India’s under-utilization of its claim, Pakistan has benefitted more than it is entitled to under the Treaty.

  • Around 90% of Pakistan’s irrigation infrastructure is in the Indus basin of about 15 million hectares of land.
  • It has now become the world’s largest contiguous irrigation system constitutes around 60,000 km of canals.
  • 3 of Pakistan’s biggest dams including Mangla which is one of the largest in the world are constructed on Jhelum river.
  • These dams generate a considerable amount of Pakistan’s electricity.

What are the arguments against restricting water flow to Pakistan?

Claims of Pakistan

  • Even before India’s policy shift in 2016, Pakistan had been complaining about denial of its due share of waters.
  • Pakistan maintained that India had violated the Indus Treaty, particularly with respect to several projects on the Indus rivers.
  • It maintains that the Treaty had failed to protect Pakistan’s interests and India had managed to misuse the provisions in its favor.
  • Consequently, several objections were raised by Pakistan with regards to projects to be launched in India. These include the Ratle Project, the Pakal Dul Dam, Sawalkot, etc.
  • However, India maintains that the primary objective of Pakistan was to delay these projects = forcing a cost escalation + making them economically unviable.

It is unethical and impractical to violate the treaty because of the following reasons:

Indus waters treaty upsc ias gk

  • Indus Waters Treaty seeks to reduce hostilities between India and Pakistan. It should be kept in the same spirit.
  • India has always dealt with water and security issues separately with Pakistan.
  • 80 percent of Pakistan’s agricultural land is being irrigated by Indus river system = reducing the water flow will cause havoc particularly in Punjab and Sindh provinces.
  • Breaking the Indus treaty doesn’t make any sense since India currently does not have sufficient infrastructure to utilize the additional water available = may create a flood in the Kashmir valley.
  • The decision of not giving water to Pakistan may further enrage the terror elements in Pakistan = intensify attacks on India.
  • Not respecting the Indus Treaty, may invite global condemnation to India since the treaty is an international agreement.
  • Neighbors such as Bangladesh and Nepal with whom we have water treaties will become skeptical.
  • There are also concerns that China may block the water of Brahmaputra to Assam as a sign of revenge.
  • The Kashmir issue will receive a whole new dimension if India withdraws from the Treaty. It would also trigger the launch of water wars.
  • India, aspiring for a seat in UNSC, should safeguard bilateral treaties instead of violating it.

What is the recent decision of India?

  • Following the Pulwama terror attack 2019, India decided to exert much higher control over the waters of the Indus basin. But it will continue to follow the provisions of the Indus Waters Treaty 1960.
  • A high-level task force was established under the guidance of the Principal Secretary to the PM to ensure that India makes full use of the waters it is entitled to under the Treaty.

 

India has never utilized its rights under the Indus Water Treaty on the western rivers for irrigation, storage, and even for generating electricity, in the manner specified. If we just do what we are entitled to under the Treaty, it would be sufficient to send jitters through Pakistan. It would be a strong signal without doing anything drastic.

Related Articles

India-Pakistan Relations: Evolution, Challenges & Recent Developments

Last year, the bilateral ties between India and Pakistan saw little to no progress. The India-Pakistan relations has often afflicted by cross-border terrorism, ceasefire violations, territorial disputes, etc. In 2019, the bilateral relationship was rocked by several tense events like the Pulwama terror attack, Balakot airstrike, scrapping of Jammu and Kashmir’s special status, etc. Improving bilateral ties is vital for both sides, as it would mean stabilisation of South Asia and the improvement of economies of both the nations. However, the political will to mend the relationship in the current juncture seems to be absent on both sides.

Interlinking of Rivers – Pros & Cons

Whether we realise it or not, the drinking water scarcity problem that we see in different parts of India today is a direct result of climate change. India is very vulnerable to climate change — melting Himalayan glaciers will produce floods in north India; erratic monsoons will create droughts in peninsular India.

Global action against climate change is not enough even if the Paris Agreement is followed in letter and spirit which is already weakening due to nations such as the US and Brazil walking away from it. Therefore India will have to assume the worst of impacts of global warming and tailor its programmes accordingly.

With the threat of floods and droughts looming in various parts of the country, there is no option but to make the 150-year-old idea, that is, Interlinking of Rivers (ILR) happen, and fast. The NDA government has always been in favour of inter-linking of rivers and it is to be hoped that the government sees ILR in the light of climate action, rather than a developmental move.

Financial Action Task Force (FATF), Pakistan & Terror Financing – All You Need to Know

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF), the global watchdog that combats money laundering and terrorist financing, had grey listed Pakistan in June 2018 for not cutting down the finances of terrorist groups within its soil. Greylisting puts Pakistan under international scrutiny to prove its compliance with FATF norms. Notably, the greylisting move was initiated by the US.

Even with greylisting measures, Pulwama terror attack happened in February 2019 = FATF (with India’s lobbying) threatens Pakistan that it will be moved to the blacklist due to its failure to comply with the action plan which was due May 2019. Blacklisting could virtually cut all financial flows to Pakistan.

This big-picture article explains the following in an analytical manner with a mindmap for quick revision.

  1. What is the Financial Action Task Force (FATF)?
  2. How FATF works?
  3. What is the grey list and blacklist?
  4. What is the issue with Pakistan?
  5. Why the US initiated the move?
  6. What are the implications of placing Pakistan on FATF watchlist?
  7. Has Pakistan changed with external Pressures?
  8. Why has Pakistan failed to comply with or curtail terror funding?
  9. What is the way forward?

Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) & India: Relationship

Recently India’s decades long effort to get the full membership of the 2nd largest intergovernmental group – the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) got the huge boost when it attended the OIC’s 46th session of council of foreign ministers meeting at Abu Dhabi as a guest of honour on the invitation by the host country – United Arab Emirates (UAE).It has to be noted that, India has never been invited to the OIC before and the latest development comes at a time when the India-Pakistan tension is running high, is being seen as a diplomatic success.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments