Toggle Side Panel

Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.

Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.

Close search

Ambiguity in Definition of Child

director
Santhosh Kumar 24/12/2023
0 Comments
Ambiguity in Definition of Child mind map When Various Acts Over Years Why Different Objectives of Each Law What Convention on the Rights of the Child Definition Below 18 Years Unless Majority Attained Earlier Indian Laws Child Labour (Protection and Regulation) Act, 1986 Below 14 Years Plantations Labour Act, 1951 Below 15 Years Below 12 Years for Plantation Work Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961 Below 15 Years Beedi and Cigar Workers Act, 1966 Below 14 Years Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 Below 21 Years for Males Below 18 Years for Females Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 Below 18 Years Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Below 18 Years Child and Adolescent Labour Act, 1986 (Amended 2016) Age Group 14-18 Years Right to Education Act, 2009 Age 6-14 Years Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (Amended 1986) Below 14 Years Rashtriya Kishore Swasthya Karyakram Adolescents Aged 10-19 Years How Legislation Enacted for Child Welfare and Protection Significance of proper definition Addressing Specific Needs of Different Age Groups Protection in Various Contexts Work, Education, Marriage Impacts Implementation Difficulties Due to Varying Definitions Ambiguity in Protection Measures Inconsistent Application Across Different Laws Prone to Abuse and Exploitation Child Labour Issues Sexual Violence Cases Way Forward Need for Uniform Definition Across All Laws

To summarize, the definition of a ‘child’ in Indian laws varies across different acts, each tailored to its specific context and objectives. This variance ranges from under 14 years in labor-related laws to under 18 years in juvenile justice and sexual offenses laws, with special provisions in laws concerning education and marriage. While these diverse definitions aim to cater to the unique needs of different age groups, they also create challenges in implementing child protection uniformly, leading to potential loopholes and inconsistencies in safeguarding children’s rights. The way forward suggests a harmonized definition of ‘child’ across all legislations to ensure coherent and effective child protection measures.

Related Posts

If you like this post, please share your feedback in the comments section below so that we will upload more posts like this.

Categories: Children
Tags: ,

Responses

🖍️ Highlight

Report

Harassment or bullying behavior
Contains mature or sensitive content
Contains misleading or false information
Contains abusive or derogatory content
Contains spam, fake content or potential malware

Block Member?

Please confirm you want to block this member.

You will no longer be able to:

  • See blocked member's posts
  • Mention this member in posts

Please allow a few minutes for this process to complete.

Report

You have already reported this .
HomeCoursesPlansAccount