Uniform Civil Code – Plurality Vs Uniformity

Uniform civil code upsc ias
Reading time: 5 minutes

Why in News?

The Law Commission of India has said that a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) is “neither necessary nor desirable at this stage”. In this regard, enacting justified laws is more desirable than changing personal laws for bringing in ‘uniformity’.

Uniform civil code upsc ias

What is the Uniform Civil Code?

The UCC in India aims at replacing the personal laws based on the customs and scriptures of each religious community with a common code or law governing every citizen.

Why India needs Uniform Civil Code? (Pros)

  • Nature of India– A secular republic like India needs a common law for all citizens rather than differentiated rules based on religious practices.
  • Gender Parity – The rights of women are generally restricted under religious law, be it Hindu or Muslim. Triple talaq, priority given to men in terms of succession and inheritance are some examples.
  • Uphold rights – Many practices governed by religious tradition are contrary to the fundamental rights guaranteed in the Indian constitution.
  • Judicial orders – Courts have also opined that the government should move towards a Uniform Civil Code. For example – the Shah Bano case.
  • Constitutional mandate – The constitution has a provision for Uniform Civil Code in Article 44 as a Directive Principle of State Policy (DPSP) which mentions that “The State shall endeavor to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India”. But DPSP cannot be enforced by the court. However, the legislature can enforce UCC by enacting a law.
  • National Integration – UCC would make the dream of “One Nation, One Law” come true. India believes in one nation and hence no community shall claim separate religious laws. In this way, it’ll promote national integration.
  • Young people’ aspirations – 55% of India’s population comprised of people below 25% years of age. Their social attitudes and aspirations are based on universal principles of humanity, equality, and modernity. In order to realize their full potential for nation building, their attitudes and aspirations should be respected.

You might want to read: SC Verdict on Sectiom 377 – The restoration of right to dignity & free expression

Why is it not feasible in India? (Cons)

  • Practical difficulties – India is the country with diversity in religion, ethnicity, castes etc. Hence it is practically not feasible to come up with uniform rules for personal issues like marriage due to the cultural diversity. It is also difficult to convince every community to replace their age-old traditions with a new law.
  • Violation of religious freedom – UCC is considered by religious minorities as an encroachment on their rights to religious freedom. They fear that their traditional religious practices will be replaced by the rules and diktats of majority religious communities.
  • The state should not interfere in personal matters – The constitution provides for the right to freedom of religion of one’s choice. UCC would violate that right.
  • Sensitive and difficult task – UCC in its true spirit must be created by borrowing from various personal laws, making gradual changes in each, issuing judicial pronouncements, assuring gender equality and adopting expansive interpretations on marriage, maintenance, adoption, and succession. These are daunting tasks on human resource wise. Moreover, the government should be sensitive and unbiased at each stage while dealing with the majority and minority communities. Otherwise, it might lead to communal violence.
  • Time is not suitable yet – There are already controversies over beef ban, saffronization of school and college curriculum, love jihad etc. At this time, the introduction of UCC would only make things worse as it would make Muslims more insecure and vulnerable to get attracted towards fundamentalist and extremist ideologies.

Law Commission’s recommendations

  • The commission stresses on initiatives to reconcile the country’s diversity with universal arguments on human rights.
  • It recommended codification of all personal laws
    • So that the prejudices and stereotypes in all religion can be brought to light.
    • They can eventually be tested against the anvil of the fundamental rights in the constitution.
    • It could help arrive at certain universal principles.
    • These may facilitate prioritizing equality instead of the imposition of UCC.
  • Uniform Civil Code would only discourage many from using the law altogether. This is especially true considering the fact that matters related to marriage and divorce can be settled extra-judicially as well. Thus the commission suggested certain amendments in the personal laws related to marriage and divorce.
    • Fixing the marriageable age of boys and girls at 18 years so that they can marry as equals.
    • Making adultery a ground for divorce for men and women.
    • Simplifying the divorce procedure.
    • It suggested making polygamy a criminal offense and applying it to all communities.

You might want to read: Anti-Trafficking Bill 2018 – Article 23 Vs Article 21

What is the way forward?

  • UCC can only emerge through an evolutionary process. Hence major sensitization efforts are required to reform current personal law reforms which should be first initiated by the communities themselves.
  • Existing institutions should be modernized, democratized and strengthened for this change.
  • Serious efforts towards women empowerment have to be taken for all women of all religions.
  • The plural democracy is an identity of modern India. Hence initiatives should be concentrated on bringing harmony in plurality, rather than blanket uniformity for flourishing Indian democracy.

Practice Question:

  1. “A secular republic like India needs a common law for all citizens rather than differentiated rules based on religious practices”. Comment.

Related Articles

Triple Talaq Issue – Tradition Vs Fundamental Rights

Recently, The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2018 (Triple Talaq bill) was passed by the Lok Sabha. The bill is humanitarian consideration for Muslim Women suffering from triple talaq. Under the proposed law, giving instant triple talaq will be illegal and void, and will attract jail term 3 years and a fine for a man.

However, there is a standoff in the Rajya Sabha for its passage due to the contention from opposition parties and Muslim community leaders who are sticking to their stand against the bill mentioning that there is no need for the bill since the instant triple talaq has already been banned by the Supreme Court.

[Updated] Sabarimala Temple Issue – Customs Vs Constitution

Kerala’s Sabarimala Temple issue is about the conflict between women rights and tradition. According to age-old traditions and customs, women from ten to fifty years of age were not permitted into Sabarimala Temple. However, the situation has changed when the constitutional bench of the Supreme Court on September 28, 2018, declared that restricting entry of women of menstruating age was unconstitutional. Thus the SC allowed women, irrespective of their age, to enter Sabarimala temple. 

Secularism in India – History, Constitution, Challenges

India is a land where people of all the major religions of the world find a peaceful home. The ancient ethos and modern philosophy of India have Secularism as its inalienable part. The idea of secularism makes India a multicultural society. Religion, though a very important part of human life, has its own share of problems associated with it. Secularism addresses those problems in a very effective manner.

This content is for General Studies (GS) Members only! Join now & access all Static GS Mindmaps (18 Subjects), Current Affairs [Newsbits (For Prelims), Editorials & Articles (For Mains)]




SC Verdict on Section 377 – The restoration of right to free expression and dignity

In a landmark judgement, the Supreme Court of India ruled that consensual adult gay sex is not a crime because sexual orientation is natural and human being have no control over it.

This content is for General Studies (GS) Members only! Join now & access all Static GS Mindmaps (18 Subjects), Current Affairs [Newsbits (For Prelims), Editorials & Articles (For Mains)]




Padmanabha Swamy Temple Verdict: overview

The Supreme Court, recently, reversed the Kerala High Court judgment of 2011 in the Padmanabha Swamy temple case and upheld the right of the Travancore Royal Family to manage the property of deity at Shree Padmanabha Swamy temple in Thiruvananthapuram. This is another historic apex court judgment with respect to the debate of legal-constitutional-state interference in the religious sphere after the Sabarimala Case.

Notify of
1 Comment
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kajal chauhan
Kajal chauhan
2 years ago

Ek bar magazine dekh sakate preview