IL&FS/NBFC Crisis – The Need for Financial Sector Reforms

Reading time: 6 minutes

The Infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services (IL&FS) crisis exposes the weakness in India’s financial regulatory architecture. It highlights the need for suitable reforms in regulatory mechanisms since the consequences are widespread.


What is the IL&FS crisis?

  • Infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services (IL&FS) is a Non-Banking Finance Company (NBFC) that lends for infrastructure projects (learn about NBFCs at the end).
  • Some of its subsidiaries defaulted on their loan = Credit rating of IL&FS as a whole was sharply degraded.
  • Due to this, Investors sold their stocks in housing finance firms leading to stock market plunge.
  • IL&FS Company is listed as “systemically important” by the RBI and hence it is “too big to fail”. The inter-linkages between IL&FS and other financial entities like banks, mutual funds, and infrastructure players are too strong and the company would have taken down all of them with it if it were allowed to fail.
  • If tax-payer money is utilized to save IL&FS, it would be another drain on the Union Budget. Notably, the centre’s finance is already burdened by mismanagement and regulatory failures in the banking sector.

What is the big picture?

  • There were shortfalls in ensuring institutions in place to monitor and regulate systemic risks.
  • IL&FS is a non-banking finance company (NBFC) regulated by RBI. However, RBI does not have all the information needed to understand risks to other financial firms arising from its debt. Notably, Pension funds, provident funds, mutual funds, and insurance companies hold the debt of IL&FS subsidiaries. But RBI does not regulate these and hence will not have the full picture.
  • The RBI may know only about bank loans to the conglomerate. But the ripple effects of financial shocks can be felt across sectors and not just financial markets.
  • The IL&FS default forced banks, mutual funds, and other fund providers to tighten lending to NBFCs by rising borrowing costs. This has created a liquidity crisis (lack of money flow) and is severely impacting the smaller NBFCs too. As the cost of borrowing is rising for NBFCs, their stock prices also plunged.

What are the steps taken to solve the crisis?

  • The central government took steps to take control of the company and arrest the spread of the contagion to the financial markets. A new board was constituted replacing the earlier which has failed to discharge its duties. New board includes some well-known bankers including Uday Kotak from Kotak Mahindra Bank.
  • As there is a need to infuse liquidity in the market, RBI infused up to Rs 36,000 crore via open market operations (purchase and sale of government securities by the RBI).

What does it call for?

  • The failure of one company can cause a risk to the whole financial system. Such systemic risk requires constant monitoring because if the firm is large, it is considered “too big to fail”. Even if it is not too big but deeply integrated with the business of other firms, it may be “too networked to fail”. In either scenario, such firms and their networks need to be monitored at all times to get a full picture of their assets and liabilities.
  • For better response, the regulator must know who will get hit if such firms fail, by how much and what will be the consequences.
  • To ensure financial stability, this supervisory task has to be given to an agency with powers to monitor risks across sectors.

What are the reforms needed?


  • In 2012, the Financial Sector Legislative Reforms Commission suggested legislative and architectural reforms for financial regulation.
  • This included a body that would monitor systemic risk.
  • The Financial Data and Management Centre would have the legal powers to collect all regulatory data along with sectoral regulators.
  • The 2016-17 Budget proposed the establishment of such data centre and subsequently, a draft bill was proposed.
  • However, concerned raised by financial regulators are delaying the implementation process.


  • Financial firms, both bank, and non-bank require an orderly mechanism for crisis resolution.
  • The Resolution Corporation was proposed to be established under the Financial Resolution and Deposit Insurance Act.
  • This would have monitored the company (IL&FS) and decided whether it is systemically important and would have stepped in before the firm defaulted.
  • However, the opposition to the legislation led to the withdrawal of the Bill.

Financial sources

  • The major reason for the IL&FS failure is the asset-liability mismatch caused by funding projects of 20-25 years payback period with relatively short-term funds of only 8-10 years.
  • Thus there is a need for a source that provides long-term finance for infrastructural projects (high gestation period).
  • The LIC and some insurance companies are the only domestic sources but they too do not lend beyond 10 to 12 years.
  • Therefore, the centre and the RBI should come up with ways to deepen the debt markets where infrastructural players can borrow long-term.

Way ahead

The lack of a quick strategy by the regulator as well as the government could result in a solvency issue resulting in a domestic debt crisis inflicting wounds on banks and mutual funds. The need of the hour is for the government to take long-term reforms in order to prevent another crisis like this from happening again.

About NBFCs

  • Non-Banking Finance Companies are those companies which provide banking services without satisfying the legal definition of a bank and thus do not have a banking license.
  • They are incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and desirous of commencing the business of non-banking financial institution as defined under the RBI Act, 1934.
  • NBFCs are not allowed to take deposits from the public, which keeps them outside the scope of traditional oversight under banking regulations.
  • NBFCs can provide banking services like loans and credit facilities, retirement planning, money markets, underwriting, and merger activities.
  • Currently, NBFCs are regulated by various regulators like RBI, SEBI, IRDA, National Housing Bank and Department of Company Affairs depending on the type of services they offer.
    • RBI regulates companies that deals in lending, financial leasing, hire purchase and acquisition of shares or stocks etc.
    • SEBI regulates companies that deals in stock broking, merchant banking etc.
    • IRDA regulates NBFCs that provides insurance services.
    • National Housing Bank regulates Housing finance companies.
    • Department of Company Affairs regulates Nidhi and Chitfund companies.

Practice Question

Evaluate various issues that are highlighted by the recent IL&FS Crisis and suggest suitable reforms to prevent such financial crisis from happening again.

Related Articles

Yes Bank Crisis – Causes, Consequences & Measures

On 5th March 2020, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had imposed a 30-day moratorium on the YES Bank, superseded the bank’s board and appointed Prashant Kumar, who was serving as chief financial officer and deputy managing director at the State Bank of India (SBI) as an administrator. Under the moratorium, deposit withdrawals were capped at Rs.50,000 per person. The apex bank had also proposed a reconstruction plan under which the SBI shall take a maximum of 49% stake in the restructured capital of the bank. The YES Bank crisis is not unique or unprecedented as it came due to the growing number of bad loans caused by the issues faced by the country’s economy, which ranges from real estate to power and NBFCs. Thus, ensuring necessary reforms in the governance, policies, etc., to safeguard the country’s financial sector are a need of the hour.

One Nation One Ombudsman – Objectives and Benefits

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in a recent move has announced that it will be integrating consumer grievances redressal under a single ombudsman as against three schemes working at present. The move comes at a time when there is an increase in digital transactions and the consumers have to face a lot of problems while getting their complaints redressed. The move is a step forward in the direction of customer empowerment and is an initiative towards providing speedy and inexpensive redressal to millions of users of India’s banking and non-banking infrastructure.

This content is for General Studies (GS) Members only! Join now & access all Static GS Mindmaps (18 Subjects), Current Affairs [Newsbits (For Prelims), Editorials & Articles (For Mains)]




DFI Model for Infrastructure Financing- Need, Challenges, Way Forward

In the Union Budget 2021-22, the Finance Minister proposed the revival of the DFI model to meet the needs of infrastructure financing. The government has set a target of 5 lakh crore INR loan within 3 years. For this, the proposed DFI is to be capitalized with 20,000 crore INR. Given the importance of infrastructure development in the post-COVID world, there is a need to examine the viability of the DFI model and how it can be made to work in India.

This content is for General Studies (GS) Members only! Join now & access all Static GS Mindmaps (18 Subjects), Current Affairs [Newsbits (For Prelims), Editorials & Articles (For Mains)]




Corporate Ownership of Banks – Challenges & Way Ahead

The RBI had recently released a report of the Internal Working Group that reviewed the current licensing and regulatory guidelines related to the ownership, control and corporate structure of private banks. This group’s most controversial recommendation was to allow corporate and industrial houses to promote and operate banks within the country. With banks playing a critical role in the economy, this recommendation, if implemented, will have large-scale implications in economic growth.

This content is for General Studies (GS) Members only! Join now & access all Static GS Mindmaps (18 Subjects), Current Affairs [Newsbits (For Prelims), Editorials & Articles (For Mains)]




Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments