[Editorial] Sputnik-like Effect of China’s Missile Test

Reading time: 4 minutes

What missile did China test?

  • In October, China tested a nuclear-capable hypersonic glide vehicle according to a report in London-based Financial Times.
  • The term ‘hypersonic’ refers to speeds that are 5 or more times faster than the speed of sound.
  • The vehicle has a ‘fractional orbital bombardment’ system, which enables it to hit a target by entering in lower orbit.
  • This vehicle flew in the low-orbit space to circle the earth before cruising down to strike its target.
  • The missile missed the target by several miles.

What does Sputnik-like effect mean?

  • Sputnik was a satellite launched by the Soviet Union in 1957.
  • It is considered as a sign of technological superiority of the erstwhile Soviet Union.
  • It is also considered as a symbol of American weakness. This is because the test caught the US intelligence unaware.
  • The shock drove the US administration, headed by Eisenhower, to set on a ballistic missile race.
  • This race led to the 2 superpowers to the brink of a disastrous war- especially during the Cuban missile crisis.
  • In late October, General Mark Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the USA, commented on the recent Chinese missile test: “I don’t know if it’s quite a Sputnik moment, but I think it’s very close to that. It has all our attention.”
  • The test could trigger a similar race among nuclear-armed countries to modernize their arsenal and add new nuclear capabilities to their arsenal.

Why is China’s missile test significant?

  • Missile defence undermines ‘strategic stability’- the foundation of the prolonged peace during the Cold War.
  • The term strategic stability means that there is a mutual vulnerability i.e. a nuclear-armed state is unable to launch the first strike, as it would leave it vulnerable to a retaliatory strike from its adversary.
  • However, a robust Ballistic Missile Defence compromises the adversary’s ability to launch a retaliatory strike. The BMD does this by neutralizing the incoming missile.
  • USA’s Ballistic Missile Defence program is viewed as a threat to the deterrence capacity of Russia and China. Hence, the 2 countries have been investing in new technologies- especially, hypersonic weapons systems- that can evade the missile defence system.
  • The recent Chinese test can be seen as an insurance against a first strike from the USA.
  • The ‘fractional orbital bombardment’ system enables China to target USA via South Pole. This is significant as USA has very few early warning systems in this region.
  • The HGVs could escape detection by early warning systems as they fly at lower altitudes than ballistic missile and are aided by the earth’s curvature.
  • Hence, their stealth and manoeuvrability, and not their speed, are the key reasons for their destabilizing nature.

We’re hiring history & psychology optional staffs for making notes (work from home).

How do such technologies impact strategic stability?

  • New technologies, like hypersonic weapons systems, impact strategic stability in 2 ways:
  • Undermine ‘crisis stability’ and incentivize nuclear first-use.
  • Encourage an action-reaction cycle and erode ‘arms-race stability’.

What is the way ahead?

  • Unlike the Sputnik test, the Chinese pursuit of hypersonic technology is not a surprise. This is especially because Russia and China have been wary of USA’s BMD program- after the American giant’s withdrawal from the 2002 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty.
  • Missile-based defence is inherently destabilizing.
  • Though the missile test is not analogous to the Sputnik test, it is expected to trigger events similar to those set in motion by the Sputnik.
  • The test is expected to trigger an intense arms race at regional and global level, given the existence of only minimal arms control at present.
  • The USA may start expanding its hypersonic program and modernizing its missile defence systems. Already, it is developing conventional long-range hypersonic missiles.

With regards to India:

  • The Chinese hypersonic weapon systems is not particularly India-focused, but it could push New Delhi to take action:
  • Accelerating its hypersonic missile program.
  • Erecting a robust missile defense system.
  • Given, India is already developing a dual-capable hypersonic cruise missile and an anti-ship hypersonic missile, there is a regional arms race on the horizon.
  • This is not particularly encouraging for the regional peace either.

Conclusion:

Though the recent Chinese test didn’t come with a Sputnik-like surprise, it has the potential to trigger a post-Sputnik-like arms race. This doesn’t bode well for strategic stability- regionally and globally.

Related Articles

Hypersonic Missile Technology

After years of R&D, India recently conducted a successful test flight of the indigenously developed Hypersonic technology demonstrator vehicle (HSTDV),  powered by a scramjet engine, which will serve as a critical building block for next-generation Hypersonic cruise missiles,  joining the elite club of the US, Russia and China who possess such technology. Hypersonic missiles that fly at lower altitudes and are very onerous to trace and intercept. Currently, the United States, Russia and China have only developed technologies to field fast-manoeuvring of it. This is often seen as India’s initial footstep towards developing Hypersonic missiles. It is in this context, Let’s make an in-depth analysis of Hypersonic missile technology.

Mission Shakti – Why is it Path-Breaking?

Recently, the DRDO’s anti-satellite missile system (ASAT) project named Mission Shakti successfully destroyed a live satellite in the Low Earth Orbit (LEO) (300 km altitude). With this test, India became the fourth country after the US, Russia, and China to achieve the feat. It is considered to be a milestone for the institutions and a significant development in terms of strengthening the country’s overall security. However, the test also sparked controversy regarding space militarization and space debris.

[Premium] US’s Withdrawal from INF Treaty – Is it the End of Arms Control?

The United States President Donald Trump has recently announced that US will unilaterally pull out of 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty which was signed by the US and Russia during Cold War era for banning all ground-launch nuclear missiles with the range between 500 and 5500 km. However, US accuses Russia to have developed a new medium-range missile and it has also been concerned about China which is not a signatory to the INF treaty, producing medium-range missiles.

[Premium] INS Arihant completed patrol – Has India truly achieved Nuclear Triad?

Recently, India’s first indigenous nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine (SSBN), INS Arihant (destroyer of enemies), has successfully completed its first deterrence patrol. It means that the submarine is fully operational now and when the signal goes out from New Delhi to INS Arihant, it should be able to launch a nuclear missile. However, experts have questioned its credibility to achieve a true nuclear triad.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x