You are appointed as an officer heading the section in Environment Pollution Control Board to ensure compliance and its follow-up. In that region, there were large number of small and medium industries which had been granted clearance. You learnt that these industries provide employment to many migrant worker. Most of the industrial units have got environmental clearance certificate in their possession. The environmental clearance seeks to curb industries and projects that supposedly hamper environment and living species in the region, But in practice. most of these units remain to be polluting units in several ways like air, water and soil pollution. As such, local people encountered persistent health problems. It was confirmed that majority of the industries were violating environmental compliance. You issued notice to all the industrial units to apply for fresh environmental clearance certificate from the competent authority. However, your action met with hostile response from a section of the industrial units, other vested interest persons and a section of the local politicians. The workers also became hostile to you as they felt that your action would lead to the closure of these industrial units, and the resultant unemployment will lead to insecurity uncertainty in their livelihood. Many owners of the industries approached you with the plea that you should not initiate harsh action as it would compel them their units, and cause huge financial loss, shortage of their products in the market. These would obviously add to the sufferings of the labourers and the consumers alike. The labour union also sent you representation requesting against the closure of the units. You simultaneously started receiving threats from unknown corners. You however received supports from some of your colleagues, who advised you to act freely to ensure environmental compliance. Local NGOs also came to your support and they demanded the closure of the polluting units immediately. [2022]

(a) What are the options available to you under the given situation?
(b) Critically examine the options listed by you.
(c) What type of mechanism would you suggest to ensure environmental compliance?
(d) What are the ethical dilemmas you faced in exercising your option?

a) Some options available to me under the given situation include:

  1. Issuing fines or penalties to the industries that are violating environmental compliance.
  2. Shutting down the industries that are violating environmental compliance, after giving them a chance to bring their operations into compliance.
  3. Working with the industries to help them bring their operations into compliance, possibly through training or providing resources.
  4. Seeking legal action against the industries that are violating environmental compliance.
  5. Engaging with local politicians, workers, and other stakeholders to find a solution that addresses both environmental concerns and the needs of the workers and the community.

b) The advantages and disadvantages of each option can be examined as follows:

  1. Issuing fines or penalties: This option may discourage future violations, but it may not be enough to bring the industries into compliance if they do not have the resources or willingness to make necessary changes. It also does not address the issue of ongoing pollution.
  2. Shutting down the industries: This option would effectively address the issue of pollution, but it would also lead to unemployment and financial losses for the industries and potentially for the workers and the community. It could also lead to shortages of the products that these industries produce.
  3. Working with the industries to bring them into compliance: This option has the potential to address the issue of pollution while minimizing negative impacts on the workers and the community. However, it requires the industries to be willing to cooperate and make necessary changes, which may not always be the case.
  4. Seeking legal action: This option may be effective in holding the industries accountable for their actions, but it can be a time-consuming and costly process. It may also not address the issue of ongoing pollution.
  5. Engaging with local politicians, workers, and other stakeholders: This option allows for the possibility of finding a solution that addresses both environmental concerns and the needs of the workers and the community. It also has the potential to build consensus and support for the chosen solution. However, it may also be challenging to achieve agreement among all the stakeholders.

c) To ensure environmental compliance, I would suggest implementing a combination of approaches, such as issuing fines or penalties for violations, providing resources and assistance to help industries bring their operations into compliance, and engaging with local politicians, workers, and other stakeholders to find a solution that addresses everyone’s concerns. It may also be helpful to establish clear guidelines and standards for environmental compliance and to regularly monitor and enforce compliance.

d) Some ethical dilemmas I faced in exercising my options include:

  1. Balancing the need to protect the environment with the need to protect the livelihoods and well-being of the workers and the community.
  2. Deciding how to hold industries accountable for their actions without causing undue harm to them or the workers and the community.
  3. Dealing with potential conflicts of interest or pressures from local politicians, vested interests, and other stakeholders.
  4. Navigating the potential for backlash or threats from those who disagree with my decisions.
  5. Considering the potential long-term impacts of my actions on the environment, the workers and the community, and the industries.
Mind map notes for UPSC
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x