I agree with the view that non-performance of duty by a public servant is a form of corruption. Corruption can be defined as the abuse of public power or position for personal gain or other illegitimate purposes. In this sense, the failure to perform one’s duty as a public servant can be seen as a form of corruption, as it involves the abuse of power and position for personal gain.
Justifications for the agreement:
• Public servants are entrusted with the responsibility of providing essential public services and delivering development projects. Failure to perform these duties can result in significant consequences for citizens and communities.
• Non-performance of duty can result in delays or incomplete implementation of public projects, which can lead to wastage of public funds and missed opportunities for economic growth and social welfare.
• Non-performance of duty can also lead to increased public debt and financial burden for future generations, which can be seen as a form of intergenerational corruption.
• Inadequate monitoring and enforcement of public duties can contribute to a culture of impunity and lack of accountability among public servants, which can facilitate other forms of corruption.
In conclusion, non-performance of duty by a public servant can be seen as a form of corruption, as it involves the abuse of public power and position for personal gain or other illegitimate purposes. To address this issue, it is essential to strengthen institutional controls and promote transparency and accountability in the performance of public duties. Furthermore, promoting ethical values and integrity among public servants can contribute to the efficient delivery of public services and infrastructure.